On May 31st, 2011 the Toronto Municipal Licensing and Standards committee (MLS) will meet to discuss a proposed ban on the retail sales of puppies and kittens in pet stores across the GTA. (Greater Toronto Area) The ban, which would make it illegal to sell puppies or kittens in pet stores, would curb the supply and demand from puppy mills as well as reduce incidences of impulse buying of animals which later end up in shelters because the decision to purchase was made spur of the moment. It would also (according to some) reduce the overpopulation of feral cats, and deal with concerns over treatment of animals in pet shops.
In a preliminary report issued by the MLS, the committee states: “Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends amendments to Article XX, Pet Shops of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 545, Licensing to clarify requirements for pet shop keepers. In addition, MLS will ensure that establishments are regularly inspected for compliance. MLS does not recommend an outright ban on the sale of cats and/or dogs, which could have a significant negative economic impact on pet shop owners.”
A significant negative economic impact on pet shop owners? Really? I and many other animal advocates do not agree with this statement. If banning retail sales of animals is going to have such a horrific negative impact on pet shop owners, does that not prove our point? I mean let’s look at this from a logical perspective shall we? The bulk of income in pet stores should not be from the sale of animals. Pet stores traditionally sell animal foods and accessories, sales of these items should far outweigh sales of live animals, which should make up only a small portion of a business’ yearly revenue.
The report goes on to say: “Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 545, Licensing, Article XX, Pet Shops addresses standards for the care and housing for animals being kept in pet shops. It also sets requirements for the overall condition that the pet shop must be kept in. Some of the bylaw requirements correspond with or go beyond what is outlined in the OSPCA Act. Examples of the Pet Shop by-law going beyond the requirements set out in the Act regarding care of animals include, but are not limited to:
1. Pet shop owners not keeping animals or birds in crowded quarters or cages
2. Pet shop owners not selling animals that are diseased or unfit for sale
3. Pet shop owner’s responsibility to ensure that any animal or bird indicating signs of sickness or disease is examined and appropriately treated within 24 hours of the onset of illness by a veterinarian or other qualified person
experienced in the care and treatment of the animal.”
The problem with this however is the fact that every inspector has their own take on what does and does not violate the Toronto Municipal code. A code which has been in place for years but does nothing to stop the mistreatment of animals in pet stores, or regulate the industry, because it is not actively enforced.
What we truly have to ask ourselves here is this, do we trust that the municipality will step up their inspection schedule, and enforce the existing licensing standards, or is this just the municipal governments way of attempting to appease animal rights activists by appearing to take action? How does this address the problem of reducing demand for puppy mill pups, or aid in reducing the population of feral cats on Toronto streets? Quite simply put, it doesn’t address either of those issues.
Surely the city of Toronto is aware that other municipalities have banned retail sales of animals (Richmond BC being the first municipality in Canada to pass the ban) with the result being little or no financial impact on pet shop proprietors. Surely the powers that be are aware that the present regulation of pet stores does nothing to stem the tide of animals from puppy mills being sold to the public as healthy companion animals?
Truth is the city doesn’t really care that they are dealing with lives and not inanimate merchandise, traditionally the powers that be view companion animals as property, and therein lies the problem. As long as we as a society refuse to see companion animals as living breathing beings that deserve humane treatment, the abuse and exploitation of animals for profit will continue.
Want to let the Toronto Municipal Licensing and Standards committee know how YOU feel about this issue? Here’s the link to their website:
Toronto Municipal Licensing and Standards
Don’t sit back and let the city make the decision for you, stand up and be counted. We owe it to the animals to ban retail sales.
Until Tomorrow Remember
BE THE CHANGE YOU SEEK!
Janette
3 Comments to “How Much is That Doggie in the Window?”
Come on, admit it… you love us!!!
Making dreams come true!
Let’s Adopt! Community Map
Let`s Adopt Network!
Recent Posts
- Postcards from Faith
- Faith in motion
- Faith restored; kudos to Brantford SPCA
- Faith has a new home!
- When rescue turns to search for Faith…
- Keeping Faith
- Thought of the day…
- Happy Father’s Day from Let’s Adopt Canada
- Pup Found in Trash Can
- Get Your 2012 events listed in our first ever Let’s Adopt Canada Calendar
- The Results Are In….Did YOUR Pet Win?
- Just Say NO to the EURO DOG Show 2012
- Have You Considered Adopting a Special Needs Pet?
- Meet Puffy: homeless & FIV+
- Sterling Virginia Police Allow Dog to Die in Hot Car
Recent Comments
- Markus R on The Link Between Serial Killers and Animal Abuse
- Janette Hamilton on Pup Found in Trash Can
- Jessica on Pup Found in Trash Can
- Kirk Sanderson on Sled Dog Murderer Robert Fawcett: Lies and Back Pedaling
- Tina on Dog Fighting in Canada
- SD on Sled Dog Murderer Robert Fawcett: Lies and Back Pedaling
- Sam on Newmarket SPCA: Is THIS Who We Want Running the Facility? Really?
- Pat Barrington on Boycott Sites Like Craigslist and Kijiji
- Jane Calladine on Just Say NO to the EURO DOG Show 2012
- Heidi on We can’t save ‘em all
- Sara Bennett on Brindi: a danger to society?
- david fialko on Sled Dog Murderer Robert Fawcett: Lies and Back Pedaling
- david fialko on Sled Dog Murderer Robert Fawcett: Lies and Back Pedaling
- Ana on Just Say NO to the EURO DOG Show 2012
- Livingstone on Sled Dog Murderer Robert Fawcett: Lies and Back Pedaling
Archives
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
Social Media Advisors
Please share this blog!
















Colleen says:
This statement also disturbs me. then again it sounds suspiciously like the law that Canada Revenue Agency wanted to pass or is trying to pass. The one stating that Animal Charities should not exist if they will impede the economic impact on humans. This in itself disgusts me and makes me ashamed to be Canadian if this is the way our Government is thinking.
I agree, people thinking of companion animals as property is very much the problem. I only shop in stores where they do NOT sell animals, such as Pet Value. I will definitely let Toronto know what my opinions are, and it’s time to write to the new mayor of Ottawa to suggest a ban in Ottawa.
Adrienne says:
Thank you for writing about this!! I beg everyone to please be present at the meeting or if you can not be there, please reach out to your local MP who can be found here http://app.toronto.ca/wards/jsp/wards.jsp and demand that they (1) be present at this meeting and (2) that they support a complete Ban not just an amendment to the by-laws. Additionally, when you write to your local Representative, you may want to address the issue of privatizing TAS (Toronto Animal Services) which is also being discussed by the City Council as they look to privatize more city services while attempting to cut the budget next year. Together we can all make they City of Toronto listen and respond. If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem and silence, will not make any change happen. Thanks so much again for drawing attention to the important issue.
Janette Hamilton says:
Thank you for bringing it to my attention, and for providing additional resources in your above comment. I agree that anyone who is not a part of the solution is a part of the problem. Unless we speak out on these and other animal related issues the government will do pretty mush as they please. We must raise our voices and speak for those who can not speak for themselves!